Task 1 Academic · Sample Answers

IELTS Task 1 Bar Chart: Band 6.5, 7.5 and 9.0 Sample Answers

Three complete responses to the same bar chart prompt, each with criterion scores and examiner notes showing exactly what separates the bands.

What separates the bands in Task 1

  • 1.Snapshot vs trend awareness — a bar chart shows one moment in time; Band 9 writers describe differences between groups, not "changes over time."
  • 2.Cross-category comparison — Band 6.5 describes each category in turn; Band 9 groups by pattern (housing dominates all groups; entertainment and healthcare move in opposite directions with age).
  • 3.Selective data use — citing every figure with equal emphasis suggests poor selection skills; Band 9 reserves specific figures for the most striking contrasts.

The Chart

Average monthly household spending by category and age group (USD, 2022)

The bar chart below shows the average monthly spending in US dollars across five categories — Food, Housing, Transport, Entertainment and Healthcare — for three age groups (18–30, 31–50 and 51–70) based on a survey of 500 households conducted in 2022.

Category 18–30 31–50 51–70
Food $380 $520 $460
Housing $750 $1,100 $800
Transport $280 $380 $290
Entertainment $210 $150 $90
Healthcare $60 $110 $280
Total $1,680 $2,260 $1,920
Task instruction: Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Sample Answer 1

Band 6.5

TA: 6  ·  CC: 6  ·  LR: 6  ·  GRA: 7   |   Overall: 6.5

158 words

The bar chart shows how much money people in three age groups spent on five different categories every month in 2022.

Overall, housing was the biggest expense for all three groups, and the 31–50 age group spent the most money.

Looking at the data, the 18–30 group spent $380 on food, $750 on housing, $280 on transport, $210 on entertainment and $60 on healthcare. The 31–50 group spent more in most categories: $520 on food, $1,100 on housing, $380 on transport, $150 on entertainment and $110 on healthcare. The 51–70 group spent $460 on food, $800 on housing, $290 on transport, $90 on entertainment and $280 on healthcare.

Entertainment spending decreased as people got older, going from $210 for the youngest group to only $90 for the oldest. Healthcare spending increased a lot, especially for the 51–70 group which paid $280, much higher than the youngest group's $60.

Examiner note: The overview is present and accurate but covers only two features. The central problem is the body paragraphs: rather than comparing patterns, the response lists every figure for each age group in sequence — a mechanical approach that signals the writer cannot select and prioritise. The phrase "increased a lot" and "much higher" are imprecise (LR: 6). There is also a subtle Task Achievement error: "Entertainment spending decreased as people got older" implies a trend over time, when the chart shows a cross-sectional snapshot. The correct register is "entertainment spending was lower among older groups." GRA is the strongest criterion: sentence structures are accurate, though variety is limited.

Sample Answer 2

Band 7.5

TA: 7  ·  CC: 8  ·  LR: 7  ·  GRA: 8   |   Overall: 7.5

172 words

The bar chart compares average monthly household spending across five categories — food, housing, transport, entertainment and healthcare — for three age groups (18–30, 31–50 and 51–70) in 2022.

Overall, housing was the dominant expense for all three groups. Spending patterns differed markedly between age groups, most notably in entertainment and healthcare, which moved in opposite directions with age.

The 31–50 group recorded the highest spending overall, with housing costs of $1,100 per month standing out as the single largest figure across all categories and groups. The 18–30 and 51–70 groups were closer in total expenditure — $1,680 versus $1,920 — but with very different distributions. While younger respondents allocated considerably more to entertainment ($210 compared with $90 for the 51–70 group), older respondents spent almost five times as much on healthcare ($280 against $60).

Food and transport followed a similar pattern across groups, with the 31–50 cohort spending the most in both categories, while the other two groups were broadly comparable.

Examiner note: This response earns Band 7.5 through a clear two-part overview that identifies both the dominant category (housing) and the key divergence (entertainment and healthcare moving in opposite directions). The body is organised thematically rather than by category listing, and the comparison of total spending with different distributions ($1,680 vs $1,920 but opposite composition) shows genuine analytical insight. The ratio "almost five times as much" for healthcare is accurate and demonstrates LR range. Cohesion is strong (CC: 8): paragraphs build logically, with effective referencing ("while younger respondents... older respondents"). Minor: "broadly comparable" slightly understates a genuine pattern but does not misrepresent the data.

Sample Answer 3

Band 9.0

TA: 9  ·  CC: 9  ·  LR: 9  ·  GRA: 9   |   Overall: 9.0

186 words

The bar chart presents average monthly household expenditure in five categories for three age cohorts — 18–30, 31–50 and 51–70 — drawn from a 500-household survey conducted in 2022.

Two features stand out. Housing was the single largest expenditure for all three groups. More strikingly, entertainment and healthcare spending moved in opposite directions across age cohorts, with entertainment falling sharply while healthcare rose substantially.

Among the three cohorts, the 31–50 group had the highest overall outgoings at $2,260 per month, driven primarily by housing costs of $1,100 — the largest figure anywhere in the chart. The 18–30 and 51–70 groups spent considerably less in total ($1,680 and $1,920 respectively), but their spending was distributed very differently. The youngest cohort allocated $210 to entertainment, more than double the $90 spent by the oldest group, while their healthcare expenditure of just $60 was less than a quarter of the $280 recorded for those aged 51–70.

Food and transport spending followed a broadly consistent pattern: highest for the 31–50 group and similar for the other two cohorts, suggesting these costs are relatively stable across the life course.

Examiner note: This response demonstrates Band 9 across all four criteria. The overview leads with housing and immediately identifies the most analytically interesting feature — the inverse relationship between entertainment and healthcare — framing it before any data appears. Body paragraph organisation is thematic and hierarchical: overall spending (31–50 highest), then the composition contrast between the 18–30 and 51–70 groups, then the stable categories. The ratio "more than double" and "less than a quarter" are both precise and verifiable from the data, demonstrating LR at the highest level. The final sentence ("relatively stable across the life course") introduces an appropriately cautious interpretive frame without straying into personal opinion. Grammar is error-free across a wide range: relative clauses, participle phrases, appositive structures, and contrastive subordination all used naturally.

Band Comparison by Criterion

What each criterion looks like at each band level for this task type.

Criterion Band 6.5 Band 7.5 Band 9.0
TA Overview present; body lists all figures sequentially by group without comparison; "decreased as people got older" misframes a snapshot as a trend Two-part overview; thematic body paragraphs with genuine comparison; correct snapshot framing; selective use of data Precise overview naming the inverse relationship pattern; hierarchical paragraph structure; verifiable ratios used for the most striking contrasts; interpretive final sentence
CC Paragraphs present but organised by group, not by insight; cohesion relies on "looking at the data" opener; repetitive sentence structures Logical thematic organisation; effective contrast sentences ("while... older respondents"); referencing accurate and varied Seamless three-paragraph logic; overview anticipates body; final paragraph resolves the remaining data naturally; no mechanical connectors
LR "Increased a lot", "much higher" — imprecise; no ratio language; all figures presented with equal weight "Almost five times as much" — accurate ratio; "markedly", "considerably" add precision; minor repetition of "spending" "More than double", "less than a quarter", "relatively stable across the life course" — precise, varied, and all verifiable; zero imprecise intensifiers
GRA Accurate but limited sentence variety; mostly simple/compound; no errors but no complexity Good range of complex structures; while-clauses for contrast; minor issues do not impede communication Error-free; appositive phrases, participle clauses, relative clauses, contrastive subordination — all used naturally and accurately

What Pushes Your Band Up

6.5 → 7.5
  • 1. Stop listing — start comparing. Instead of "Group A spent $X on Y; Group B spent $Z on Y", write "Group B spent nearly 50% more than Group A on Y ($Z vs $X)." The comparison sentence requires the same data but signals selection and analytical judgement.
  • 2. Frame the chart as a snapshot, not a trend. Replace "spending decreased as people aged" with "spending was lower among older respondents." This distinction is critical for Task Achievement and shows you understand what the chart actually shows.
  • 3. Use ratio language for the most striking contrasts. "Almost five times as much" for healthcare ($280 vs $60) is more precise and more informative than "much more." Ratio language is a Band 7 LR marker for bar chart tasks.
7.5 → 9.0
  • 1. Name the relationship pattern in the overview, not just the facts. Band 7.5 says "entertainment and healthcare moved in opposite directions." Band 9 says "entertainment fell sharply while healthcare rose substantially" — same observation, but the directional language inside the overview paragraph itself demonstrates precision before the data body begins.
  • 2. Organise by analytical priority, not by category order. The chart lists five categories; the Band 9 response covers them in three moves: (1) the 31–50 group as highest overall, (2) the 18–30 vs 51–70 composition contrast, (3) the stable residual categories. This hierarchy makes the response feel authoritative rather than descriptive.
  • 3. End with a bridging interpretive phrase. "Suggesting these costs are relatively stable across the life course" is not personal opinion — it is a cautious inference directly licensed by the data. Band 9 writers move slightly beyond description to implication; Band 7.5 writers stop at accurate description. One phrase can mark the difference.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

How do I write an overview for a bar chart Task 1?+

Identify the two most striking overall patterns — not individual figures. For example: 'Overall, housing accounted for the largest share of spending across all age groups, while entertainment decreased and healthcare increased as respondents aged.' Avoid naming specific values in the overview.

Should I describe every bar in a Task 1 bar chart?+

No. Selecting and prioritising the most significant comparisons and extremes is itself a tested skill under Task Achievement. Describing every bar without comparative commentary suggests you cannot identify which features matter — and a mechanical list will not reach Band 7.

How do I compare categories and groups in the same response?+

Use varied comparison signposting: 'In contrast to...', 'Similarly...', 'While the 18–30 group spent $210 on entertainment, those aged 51–70 spent less than half that amount at $90.' Varying comparison language demonstrates Lexical Resource range and directly fulfils the task instruction.

What is the most common Task Achievement mistake in bar chart responses?+

Describing change over time when the chart shows a cross-sectional snapshot. A bar chart comparing categories for three age groups at one point in 2022 does NOT show trends. Writing 'entertainment spending decreased' implies a time trend; the correct framing is 'entertainment spending was lower among older respondents.'

Can I use percentages when the chart shows absolute values in dollars?+

Only if you calculate them accurately. For example, if housing is $1,100 out of a $2,260 total for the 31–50 group, you could say 'nearly half'. Imprecise or miscalculated percentages cost Lexical Resource and Task Achievement marks. Stay with the chart's original units unless you are confident in the conversion.

Ready to improve your Task 1 band?

Check your own Task 1 writing instantly with our free tool — or send it to a qualified assessor for detailed criterion-by-criterion feedback within 48 hours.

Free Writing Checker Get Expert Correction — from $19